<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-mail best practices: The basics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hotdesign.com/2010/03/e-mail-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hotdesign.com/2010/03/e-mail-best-practices/</link>
	<description>The creative agency for technology companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 03:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsti Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.hotdesign.com/2010/03/e-mail-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-6180</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsti Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hotdesign.com/?p=2630#comment-6180</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Carl. I think Stu was trying to make sure that one e-mail didn&#039;t include a crazy number of links. Multiple messages could be covered in multiple e-mails, instead of in one single e-mail. That being said, I&#039;m all for providing enough content to find out what interests readers, and the suggestion to put disparate links is a great one. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Carl. I think Stu was trying to make sure that one e-mail didn&#8217;t include a crazy number of links. Multiple messages could be covered in multiple e-mails, instead of in one single e-mail. That being said, I&#8217;m all for providing enough content to find out what interests readers, and the suggestion to put disparate links is a great one. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Street</title>
		<link>http://blog.hotdesign.com/2010/03/e-mail-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-6165</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hotdesign.com/?p=2630#comment-6165</guid>
		<description>Hi Kirsti,

One small correction from both a CC University Graduate Constant Contact Business Partner and 40+ year Marketing professional:

Links:  should read AT LEAST 3 in one e-mail; rather than 3 or fewer.  And those links should be disparate -- meaning NOT all the same or greatly similar.  For example: a travel agency should include links to Alaska, Europe, Hawaii; rather than 3 links to Hawaii, etc.  

The reason is EVERY e-mail is a &quot;scouting mission&quot; and each link provides the opportunity to get a clearer picture of the interests and motivations of your target audience.  Thus, 3 different links gives you a more definitive picture than 3 similar.

Hope this helps -- please feel free to contact me directly if you would like further clarification.

Best always,

Carl Street</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kirsti,</p>
<p>One small correction from both a CC University Graduate Constant Contact Business Partner and 40+ year Marketing professional:</p>
<p>Links:  should read AT LEAST 3 in one e-mail; rather than 3 or fewer.  And those links should be disparate &#8212; meaning NOT all the same or greatly similar.  For example: a travel agency should include links to Alaska, Europe, Hawaii; rather than 3 links to Hawaii, etc.  </p>
<p>The reason is EVERY e-mail is a &#8220;scouting mission&#8221; and each link provides the opportunity to get a clearer picture of the interests and motivations of your target audience.  Thus, 3 different links gives you a more definitive picture than 3 similar.</p>
<p>Hope this helps &#8212; please feel free to contact me directly if you would like further clarification.</p>
<p>Best always,</p>
<p>Carl Street</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

